With demomcrary facing challanges globally, there has been growing interest in the model of metiocracy in recent political studies. M. Hamza Uçar's Imperial Metiocracies: Comparing Models of Ottoman and Ming Dynasty the Sixteenth Century provides a comparative study on the meritocratic systems of the Late-Ming China, and the sixteenth century Ottoman Empire. Based on a careful histirocal analysis, this study not only accounts vividly the “Imperial Meritocracy” of the two ancient empires, but also has important theoretical implications for studies of democracy and meritocracy.
With demomcrary facing challanges globally, there has been growing interest in the model of metiocracy in recent political studies. M. Hamza Uçar's Imperial Metiocracies: Comparing Models of Ottoman and Ming Dynasty the Sixteenth Century provides a comparative study on the meritocratic systems of the Late-Ming China, and the sixteenth century Ottoman Empire. Based on a careful histirocal analysis, this study not only accounts vividly the “Imperial Meritocracy” of the two ancient empires, but also has important theoretical implications for studies of democracy and meritocracy.